I had a friend recently defend Michael Bloomberg, citing that he is a good guy who is only trying to keep NYC safe. I would advise that he (and all who do not know the truth) read the following article.
http://www.irishexaminerusa.com/mt/2012/06/05/bloomberg_vs_giuliani_no_conte.html
From there, I rest my case on Mayor Bloomberg.
However, to the other issue, that issue being one involving my "tantrums" in my defense of the Second Amendment. I would say this: You men who advocate gun control; let us see how you perceive your stand on guns in a situation where your wife, your sister, your mother or your daughter were about to be raped by a man who, in every case, is larger, stronger and determined to commit the crime. Give me a scenario whereby you would see fit to disarm her if she was trained and if she had the option of using a gun to defend herself.
Without a firearm as an equalizer against a rapist, you do have two options: Lay down, shut up and take it, in the hopes that he lets you live afterwards. Or you can blow a rape whistle, urinate on yourself then lay down, shut up and take it, in the hopes that he lets you live afterwards.
Clearly you good men need to understand that evil men don't care about pleading, submission and "cooperation" in rape. A rapist cares about power, anger, and sadistic humiliation of his victims. Think again whether or not you would allow such a crime to proceed unchallenged. Can you always be there to protect her? No. But you can educate her, train her, and arm her so that she has the right to defend herself against evil should it threaten.
Could you love her any less?
Da Momma: Opinions, reflections, and other words of profundity, inspiration, humor... maybe some nonsense.
No comments:
Post a Comment